tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19824504.post116017581579683028..comments2023-11-13T02:03:40.522-08:00Comments on FALLING PANDA: Another Double StandardFalling Pandahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08942230822707549072noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19824504.post-1160454704195211562006-10-09T21:31:00.000-07:002006-10-09T21:31:00.000-07:00You do realize that by using the $3 Trillion numbe...You do realize that by using the $3 Trillion number rather than the more often cited $250 billion dollar amount of the deficit, you can no longer say that President Clinton balanced the budget as Democrats so often claim.<BR/><BR/>The Novak article seems to confirm the part of yur post where you said that the GOP urged Foley to run again, but not because they wanted to preserve the seat as you implied. Again, the seat was safely Reublican until now. <BR/><BR/>As for Hastert, the best you can do is assume that he was aware of sexually explicit e-mails. The evidence that we have now does not confrim this.Falling Pandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08942230822707549072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19824504.post-1160356460100120252006-10-08T18:14:00.000-07:002006-10-08T18:14:00.000-07:00First off, I have never heard that foley wanted to...First off, I have never heard that foley wanted to resign in 2004, anywhere. You may want to cite that for me.<BR/>Next, the seat is in a safely Republican district. They would have held it even if Foley had left. Only now is it in danger of falling into the hands of the Democrats.Falling Pandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08942230822707549072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19824504.post-1160320212784551832006-10-08T08:10:00.000-07:002006-10-08T08:10:00.000-07:00here's your answer Dan - because we're the wild fr...here's your answer Dan - because we're the wild free-for-all fuckfest party. We don't pretend to stand for silly things like "family values."Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19824504.post-1160201664288302162006-10-06T23:14:00.000-07:002006-10-06T23:14:00.000-07:00Mel Renyolds was the one that I know of who reciev...Mel Renyolds was the one that I know of who recieved a pardon from president Clinton.Falling Pandahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08942230822707549072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19824504.post-1160200216883184992006-10-06T22:50:00.000-07:002006-10-06T22:50:00.000-07:00anonymous suzie:Yes, A MEMBER OF CONGRESS WENT AFT...anonymous suzie:<BR/><BR/>Yes, A MEMBER OF CONGRESS WENT AFTER 16 YEAR OLDS!! Went after but did not have sex with 16 years olds. <BR/><BR/>AND A MEMBER OF CONGRESS WENT AFTER 17 YEAR OLDS - Congressman Gary Studds. Studds sexually propositioned pages and actually had sex with a 17 year old male page whom he took on a trip overseas.<BR/><BR/>So where was the big flap about Studds? And Lordy, Lordy... he was REPEATEDLY re-elected. <BR/><BR/>Dan is not responding to Foley's actions with "Dems are bad too" - everyone agrees that he is a first class schmuck - he is simply pointing out the double standard at work. You think that's disgraceful? You're wound a little too tight around the axle if you ask me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19824504.post-1160190612252279672006-10-06T20:10:00.000-07:002006-10-06T20:10:00.000-07:00you are so factually wrong. Name one of the 3 ment...you are so factually wrong. Name one of the 3 mentioned at the beginning of this blog who receiving "presidential pardons" OR who'se scandal was covered up by the leadership.<BR/><BR/>Please provide those VERY SIMPLE facts (I assume since you have made the statements you have taken the time to fact-check).<BR/><BR/>I like how the GOP response is "Foley is bad....BUT."<BR/><BR/>Personally, I find it so incredibly offensive that we have people saying "well democrats have done bad stuff too" as the argument.<BR/><BR/>A MEMBER OF CONGRESS WENT AFTER (THE COUNT IS UP TO 6) 16 YEAR OLDS!! How you can sit there and say "well democrats are bad too" as your only response, is simply disgraceful.<BR/><BR/>I hope for your own credibility, you remove this particular post.<BR/><BR/>suzieAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com